[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Defining functions within functions?
From: |
Marcin Borkowski |
Subject: |
Re: Defining functions within functions? |
Date: |
Wed, 25 May 2016 17:41:23 +0200 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 0.9.16; emacs 25.1.50.1 |
On 2016-05-25, at 11:07, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 04:36:16AM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>
>> These kinds of callback codes are often described as "CPS-style code",
>> and in some cases a couple of macros can go a long way to hiding this
>> machinery and give the illusion of "plain old sequential code", reducing
>> the nesting madness.
>
> Nevertheless: debugging is still torture, right?
Especially with request.el... In case of (some types of) errors in
callbacks, requests just fails completely silently, with no error
message whatsoever...
Best,
--
Marcin Borkowski
http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski
Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science
Adam Mickiewicz University
- Re: Defining functions within functions?, (continued)
- Re: Defining functions within functions?, Michael Heerdegen, 2016/05/23
- Re: Defining functions within functions?, Marcin Borkowski, 2016/05/24
- Re: Defining functions within functions?, Marcin Borkowski, 2016/05/25
- Re: Defining functions within functions?, Stefan Monnier, 2016/05/25
- Re: Defining functions within functions?, Nicolas Petton, 2016/05/25
- Re: Defining functions within functions?, Marcin Borkowski, 2016/05/25
- Re: Defining functions within functions?, tomas, 2016/05/25
- Re: Defining functions within functions?,
Marcin Borkowski <=
- RE: Defining functions within functions?, Drew Adams, 2016/05/25
- Re: Defining functions within functions?, Marcin Borkowski, 2016/05/25