Re: Build Emacs without Lisp?

[Rusi]

On Sunday, June 26, 2016 at 5:50:15 PM UTC+5:30, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> >> My questions are:
> >>
> >>   - Is it possible to build emacs without Lisp? If so, how?
> >>
> >>   - Are there other work arounds available for the seg fault?
> >>
> >
> > Taking your subject line literally (ie not the usual way its done today
> > to suggest emacs = gnu-emacs)
> > have you seen this list of 'smaller' emacsen: 
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emacs#Various_Emacs_editors
> 
> Thanks, that's a good point. I'm so used to emacs, I grab it with no thought.
> 
> Maybe an emacs knock-off is a better solution until we get a working
> debugger to investigate the issue.
> 

My first encounter with emacs was 25 years ago -- jove -- pure C
[Not counting edwin -- pure scheme -- around the same time]
I'd be surprised if that stuff worked today... 

IOW How much of that list is current... Dunno