Re: Changing the factor used in universal arugment

[Emanuel Berg]

john@ankarstrom.se (John Ankarström) writes:

>> What precisely do you have in mind? What do you
>> want to achieve? If the default value of C-u, which
>> is 4, is too blunt an instrument for your purpose,
>> have you tried the arbitrary numeric prefixes, say,
>> C-3 or M-5, just to specify two?
>
> This! C-2 is just as simple as C-u. The only
> difference is you can't multiply it, like C-u C-u
> C-u.

`C-u 2' (or C-u whatever) is even more simple and it
doesn't get more arbitrary than that. Well, possibly
papal rule in the Vatican was even more arbitrary...

-- 
underground experts united
http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573