Re: Changing the factor used in universal arugment

[John Ankarström]

Emanuel Berg <moasen@zoho.com> writes:

> john@ankarstrom.se (John Ankarström) writes:
>
>> This! C-2 is just as simple as C-u. The only
>> difference is you can't multiply it, like C-u C-u
>> C-u.
>
> `C-u 2' (or C-u whatever) is even more simple and it
> doesn't get more arbitrary than that. Well, possibly
> papal rule in the Vatican was even more arbitrary...

C-2 is arguably simpler than C-u 2, as the latter requires more
keypresses, but in the end, who cares? :-)

- John