[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CVE-2017-14482 - Red Hat Customer Portal
From: |
Richard Melville |
Subject: |
Re: CVE-2017-14482 - Red Hat Customer Portal |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Sep 2017 11:51:58 +0100 |
On 26 September 2017 at 19:57, Narendra Joshi <narendraj9@gmail.com> wrote:
> <tomas@tuxteam.de> writes:
>
> > On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 04:42:54PM +0200, Óscar Fuentes wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >> It seems that you think that formal verification says that the software
> >> is correct. That's in theory. Practice is different, as usual.
> >
> > And to embellish this discussion with an Argument by Authority:
> >
> > "Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it
> > correct, not tried it."
> >
> > http://www-cs-faculty.stanford.edu/~knuth/faq.html
> And I would like to add this to the farrago presented in this thread:
> http://wiki.c2.com/?LetItCrash
>
> You talk about formal verification (always?) but for some use cases,
> it's okay to start with "Let it crash!". People have done it
> (successfully).
>
You must be an Erlang aficionado :-)
Richard
- Re: CVE-2017-14482 - Red Hat Customer Portal, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: CVE-2017-14482 - Red Hat Customer Portal, Emanuel Berg, 2017/09/24
- Re: CVE-2017-14482 - Red Hat Customer Portal, ken, 2017/09/22
- Re: CVE-2017-14482 - Red Hat Customer Portal, Emanuel Berg, 2017/09/22
- Re: CVE-2017-14482 - Red Hat Customer Portal, Bob Proulx, 2017/09/23
- Message not available
- Re: CVE-2017-14482 - Red Hat Customer Portal, Emanuel Berg, 2017/09/24
- Re: CVE-2017-14482 - Red Hat Customer Portal, Maxim Cournoyer, 2017/09/24
- Re: CVE-2017-14482 - Red Hat Customer Portal, Emanuel Berg, 2017/09/24
Re: CVE-2017-14482 - Red Hat Customer Portal,
Richard Melville <=