Re: return first element in list with certain property

[Michael Heerdegen]

Emanuel Berg <moasen@zoho.com> writes:

> > And if you want to be cool:
> >
> > (seq-find (apply-partially #'< 1) '(1 1 3 1 4
> > 2)) ==> 3
>
> "And" if you want to be cool? I agree `apply-partially' is cooler but
>  why is `seq-find' better than `cl-find-if'?

I (too) didn't want to imply that.  Both functions are defined, so both
are there to be used.


Michael.