|
From: | Nikolay Kudryavtsev |
Subject: | Re: Test Alternative initialize scheme |
Date: | Sat, 7 Apr 2018 00:15:31 +0300 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 |
The reason for their existence is that building a working config with bells and whistles may take quite a lot of time and effort, depending on required applications. And at some point there would be workflow disagreements. The two major areas are keyboard bindings(vanilla, vim, ergoemacs) and minibuffer completion(ivy, icicles, helm). Then there's package management, I think there's almost as many package managers for Emacs now, as there are for Unix. Init.el organization is another hotly contested area, with different ideas like storing it in org-mode and tangling.
-- Best Regards, Nikolay Kudryavtsev
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |