[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
(interactive) call or form?
From: |
Marcin Borkowski |
Subject: |
(interactive) call or form? |
Date: |
Sun, 08 Apr 2018 05:52:29 +0200 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.1.0; emacs 27.0.50 |
Hi all,
the article about Emacs and TeX is in the final stage of proof-reading.
(In case you didn't know, folks at the TUGboat are _extremely_ good
copyeditors, and they caught _a lot_ of typos/grammar/stylistic mistakes
in the paper!) During the discussion, I started to think: can an
"interactive form" (i.e., the thing that makes a function a command) be
called an "interactive call"? I supposed not, since `interactive' is
not actually "called", but I'm not so sure anymore. Doing M-:
(interactive "whatever") yields nil, so I assume that calling
`interactive' actually does nothing (like `ignore'), and it is its
presence in the defun that matters. (And I found out by experimenting
that it may be located anywhere in the defun, but not nested e.g. in an
`if'.) Also, much of what I found is confirmed by the docstring, but
not everything.
So, is it better to call it a "form" or a "call"?
TIA,
--
Marcin Borkowski
http://mbork.pl
- (interactive) call or form?,
Marcin Borkowski <=