Re: Precedence of for clauses in cl-loop

[Noam Postavsky]

On 7 September 2018 at 08:35, Plamen Tanovski <pgt@tanovski.de> wrote:

> (cl-loop
>  for x on (number-sequence 1 10)
>  for z in (elt (number-sequence 1 10) (car x)))
>
> works fine, which means, x was assigned a value before the for z clause.

Hmm, I wasn't aware of this, but it seems to be on purpose,
https://www.cs.cmu.edu/Groups/AI/html/cltl/clm/node239.html says:

    All variables are initialized first, regardless of where the
establishing clauses appear in the source. The order of initialization
follows the order of these clauses.