help-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Emacs documentation is bad


From: Noam Postavsky
Subject: Re: Emacs documentation is bad
Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2018 17:39:54 -0400

On 9 September 2018 at 17:33, Barry Fishman <barry@ecubist.org> wrote:

> If Scheme semantics are that important to you, you could move your project to
> a Scheme environment, maybe MIT Scheme and Erwin, if you want a Scheme
> based Emacs.  Or help with the project implementing Guile Emacs.

AFAIK, Guile Emacs doesn't change the semantics of Emacs Lisp, it just
reimplements the same semantics using the Guile VM bytecode
interpreter.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]