Re: Do we need to bind to both RET and <return> variants?

[Kaushal Modi]

On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 8:51 PM Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
wrote:

> > Earlier I did not have a S-<return> binding in my config. So once the
> > binding changed to S-RET (in org-mode-map) upstream in Org, S-<return>
> > stopped working for me altogether (Emacs GUI).
>
> This applies to RET/TAB/DEL but not when modifiers are applied to them
> (hysterical raisins and all).
>

So for the Modifier + RET bindings, we need to define the Modifier +
<return> bindings too, right?

If so, I can convey this to the Org mailing list and get the bindings
fixed.. have not just S+RET, but also S+<return>, and so on for all
modifier + RET bindings.