Re: 1L?

[조성빈]

Looking the thread it looks like you’ve used macOS for these years and finding 
a new mac :-)
While many people in this list are free-software advocates and doesn’t like 
‘proprietary apple software ‘ and insists on free software, Apple’s macOS is 
much, much helpful on tasks that you can’t solve with emacs (like web surfing). 
The new Mac Mini is very powerful and the i3 processor will be sufficient to 
run emacs, but I would recommend the i5 processor (for daily tasks that emacs 
can’t do).
If you’re just looking for a portable computer, the new MacBook Air may be 
another good option. (MacBook Pro too, if you have a sufficient budget for your 
computer)

나의 iPhone에서 보냄

2019. 2. 7. 오후 7:31, Van L <van@scratch.space> 작성:

> Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
> 
>>> I am unfamiliar with the term "1L", and Google wasn't much help. What
>>> does it mean beyond "one liter"?
> 
>> I think he meant just that: one liter, i.e. an approximate upper limit
>> on the size of the machine.
> 
> I picked it up from the Lenovo brochureware techspecs. Perhaps this
> capacity measure has origin in watercooling. The specs mention
> certification for independent software vendors and that I expect means
> chances are better for Debian and the like to "just work".
> 
>> Shouldn't *all* "1L machines" run Emacs
>> just fine?
> 
> It takes quite a while for gnus to process L117196 on entry to
> gmane.emacs.help.  And, multitasking is impossible while this is
> busy. A 6core cpu with HT won't make a difference to the 4core without
> HT in performance, here.
> 
>> Anyway the RPi, even including the case, should
>> be way below the 1L constraint
> 
> The worry is RPi's hobbykit won't cool adequately. The bits and pieces
> wearout quick, for example, the SD card, &c, &c.
> 
> -- 
> © 2019 Van L
>  gpg using EEF2 37E9 3840 0D5D 9183  251E 9830 384E 9683 B835
>  "Where is the letter T?" -Joni Mitchell
> 
>