[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is Elisp really that slow?
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: Is Elisp really that slow? |
Date: |
Tue, 04 Jun 2019 03:50:42 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) |
Drew Adams wrote:
>>>> Not much we can do about that. Feel free
>>>> to lobby distros to include Emacs. IMO, if
>>>> something is related to 40-year old
>>>> decision, it is this one.
>>>
>>> Yes. Unix distributions did usually include
>>> both vi and Emacs. Why wouldn't GNU/Linux
>>> distributions include both?
>>
>> What's the "40-year old decision"?
>
> That was Eli who spoke about such a decision.
> Presumably he meant a decision, or decisions,
> by those in charge of GNU/Linux distributions
> not to include Emacs.
Yes, but what decision was that? In 1979?
$ echo $(( 2019 - 40 ))
1979
But GNU is from 1983, and Linux from 1991. [1]
[1] https://dataswamp.org/~incal/COMP-HIST
--
underground experts united
http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573
https://dataswamp.org/~incal
- Re: Is Elisp really that slow?, Jean Louis, 2019/06/01
- Re: Is Elisp really that slow?, Emanuel Berg, 2019/06/01
- Re: Is Elisp really that slow?, Stefan Huchler, 2019/06/02
- Re: Is Elisp really that slow?, Emanuel Berg, 2019/06/03
- Re: Is Elisp really that slow?,
Emanuel Berg <=
- Re: Is Elisp really that slow?, Emanuel Berg, 2019/06/03
- Re: Is Elisp really that slow?, Emanuel Berg, 2019/06/03
- Re: Is Elisp really that slow?, Emanuel Berg, 2019/06/03
- Re: Is Elisp really that slow?, Emanuel Berg, 2019/06/03
- Re: Is Elisp really that slow?, Emanuel Berg, 2019/06/03
- Re: Is Elisp really that slow?, Emanuel Berg, 2019/06/04
- Re: Is Elisp really that slow?, Emanuel Berg, 2019/06/04
- Re: Is Elisp really that slow?, Emanuel Berg, 2019/06/05