Re: Exclamation mark in a syntax table

[Stefan Monnier]

> but symbol-at-point for !foo still returns !foo. Furthermore, I see no
> way of specifying that a leading ! is an expression prefix but in any
> other place it is a symbol constituent.

You can try a syntax like "_ p".  But it all depends on the details of
what you really want/need.  There's a good chance you'll need to use
syntax-propertize-function to give different syntaxes to those
different cases.


        Stefan