[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer"
|
From: |
Marcin Borkowski |
|
Subject: |
Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer" |
|
Date: |
Wed, 31 Jul 2019 09:41:40 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.1.0; emacs 27.0.50 |
On 2019-07-31, at 08:11, Emanuel Berg <moasenwood@zoho.eu> wrote:
> Marcin Borkowski wrote:
>
>> While we're at that, sometimes I'd like to
>> have also timestamps there. But maybe that's
>> too much.
>
> In what format - Unix time? But what if you hit
> more than one key in less than one second?
How about ISO 8601? Also, why would the same timestamp for a few
entries be a problem? The problem I'd like to solve is "I did something
strange 10 seconds ago, I want to know what I did, I'm not interested
in stuff that happened 4 or 40 seconds ago".
IOW, even better format could be
"2019-07-31T07:40:04+00:00 (18 seconds ago)"
Best,
--
Marcin Borkowski
http://mbork.pl
- improvements to the "lossage buffer", Emanuel Berg, 2019/07/30
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Stefan Monnier, 2019/07/30
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Emanuel Berg, 2019/07/30
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Emanuel Berg, 2019/07/30
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Marcin Borkowski, 2019/07/31
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Emanuel Berg, 2019/07/31
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer",
Marcin Borkowski <=
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Emanuel Berg, 2019/07/31
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Marcin Borkowski, 2019/07/31
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Dan Sommers, 2019/07/31
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Marcin Borkowski, 2019/07/31
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Yuri Khan, 2019/07/31
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Emanuel Berg, 2019/07/31
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Stefan Monnier, 2019/07/31
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Marcin Borkowski, 2019/07/31