[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer"
|
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
|
Subject: |
Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer" |
|
Date: |
Thu, 01 Aug 2019 03:34:44 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) |
Yuri Khan wrote:
> Be aware that proper RFC 3339 is a subset of
> ISO 8601; as such, it, too, uses the
> T separator between date and time, not
> the space.
Only date(1) uses improper RFC 3339:
$ date --rfc-3339=date
2019-08-01
$ date --rfc-3339=seconds
2019-08-01 03:32:43+02:00
$ date --rfc-3339=ns
2019-08-01 03:32:45.480938921+02:00
--
underground experts united
http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573
https://dataswamp.org/~incal
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", (continued)
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Emanuel Berg, 2019/07/30
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Emanuel Berg, 2019/07/30
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Marcin Borkowski, 2019/07/31
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Emanuel Berg, 2019/07/31
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Marcin Borkowski, 2019/07/31
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Emanuel Berg, 2019/07/31
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Marcin Borkowski, 2019/07/31
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Dan Sommers, 2019/07/31
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Marcin Borkowski, 2019/07/31
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Yuri Khan, 2019/07/31
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer",
Emanuel Berg <=
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Stefan Monnier, 2019/07/31
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Marcin Borkowski, 2019/07/31