[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: package-autoremove ? Looking like a bug...
From: |
Stefan Kangas |
Subject: |
Re: package-autoremove ? Looking like a bug... |
Date: |
Thu, 3 Sep 2020 22:37:16 +0000 |
David Masterson <dsmasterson92630@outlook.com> writes:
> Sounds like you're onto something. I recently started using use-package
> and the problem began after that. What you're suggesting is that you
> have to install packages with the package manager and then use
> use-package to load them.
>
> Anyone else seen this?
Yes, the other day `package-autoremove' wanted to remove a ton of
packages for me. So I took a closer look.
`package-autoremove' uses `package-selected-packages' to know which
packages to remove. More specifically, it calls
`package--removable-packages', where the doc string explains:
"Return a list of names of packages no longer needed.
These are packages which are neither contained in
`package-selected-packages' nor a dependency of one that is."
In my case, some packages that I have (most likely) installed via
use-package are _not_ in `package-selected-packages'. This seems like a
bug. I'm not sure if it's in use-package or package.el, however.
With a bit of luck, John Wiegley is reading this list, and could
comment on this.
Best regards,
Stefan Kangas