Re: Is there equivalent internal function for this list-has-elements?

[Jean Louis]

* Joost Kremers <joostkremers@fastmail.fm> [2020-10-19 00:22]:
> 
> On Sun, Oct 18 2020, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > If I understand this one correctly, it can be expressed as:
> >
> >   (seq-filter
> >     (lambda (elt) (string-match needle elt))
> >     haystack)
> 
> Small nit-pick, but it's generally better to use `string-match-p` if you're 
> just
> testing whether a string matches a regexp. `string-match` modifies the match
> data, `string-match-p` doesn't.

Thanks.