[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: problems with Emacs 28
From: |
Michael Heerdegen |
Subject: |
Re: problems with Emacs 28 |
Date: |
Sat, 24 Oct 2020 21:26:54 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com> writes:
> FWIW, I think it's a mistake for Emacs to adopt
> that convention now, or at least it's a mistake
> to adopt it only partially.
I think it's ok if we end with a handful of functions that
are explicitly labeled that way to indicate they are the
in-place-modifying counterpart of some other existing pure function
where the return value matters. As long as "!" is rarely seen, it's not
suggesting that Emacs uses exactly the same convention as scheme.
Michael.
- problems with Emacs 28, Emanuel Berg, 2020/10/23
- Re: problems with Emacs 28, Jean Louis, 2020/10/23
- Re: problems with Emacs 28, Emanuel Berg, 2020/10/23
- Re: problems with Emacs 28, Emanuel Berg, 2020/10/23
- Re: problems with Emacs 28, Michael Heerdegen, 2020/10/24
- Re: problems with Emacs 28, Emanuel Berg, 2020/10/24
- Re: problems with Emacs 28, Michael Heerdegen, 2020/10/25
- RE: problems with Emacs 28, Drew Adams, 2020/10/25
- Re: problems with Emacs 28, Emanuel Berg, 2020/10/26
- Re: problems with Emacs 28, Michael Heerdegen, 2020/10/27
- Re: problems with Emacs 28, Jens C . Jensen, 2020/10/28
- Re: problems with Emacs 28, Emanuel Berg, 2020/10/28
- Re: problems with Emacs 28, Stefan Monnier, 2020/10/28
- Re: problems with Emacs 28, Emanuel Berg, 2020/10/31