help-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Lunar Phases in Calendar


From: Christopher Dimech
Subject: Re: Lunar Phases in Calendar
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 18:37:50 +0100

Please refer to the following

https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/resources/676/phases-of-the-moon/

Regards
Christopher

---------------------
Christopher Dimech
General Administrator - Naiad Informatics - GNU Project (Geocomputation)
- Geophysical Simulation
- Geological Subsurface Mapping
- Disaster Preparedness and Mitigation
- Natural Resource Exploration and Production
- Free Software Advocacy


> Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2020 at 6:23 PM
> From: "Jude DaShiell" <jdashiel@panix.com>
> To: "Jean Louis" <louis@rcdsociety.com>
> Cc: "Christopher Dimech" <dimech@gmx.com>, tomas@tuxteam.de, 
> help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: Lunar Phases in Calendar
>
> I have a contact in for that source, probably will be in form of an url
> possibly with printed book references.  I don't read printed books since
> my first reading language by absolute necessity was braille.
>
> On Thu, 19 Nov 2020, Jean Louis wrote:
>
> > Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 10:17:19
> > From: Jean Louis <louis@rcdsociety.com>
> > To: Jude DaShiell <jdashiel@panix.com>
> > Cc: Christopher Dimech <dimech@gmx.com>, tomas@tuxteam.de,
> >     help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
> > Subject: Re: Lunar Phases in Calendar
> >
> > * Jude DaShiell <jdashiel@panix.com> [2020-11-19 17:37]:
> > > Then of course, you've got lunar mansions used in India for timing.  But
> > > emacs can't even get the 8 phases right so all of this may be better
> > > done using external software and pasting its results into an emacs
> > > buffer.  For those with any interest, a phase  has a 45 degree angle not
> > > a 90 degree angle.
> >
> > Thanks. Could you find references for that?
> >
> > If it is not correct in Emacs, could you please find the reference and
> > {M-x report-emacs-bug RET} with such?
> >
> > Jean
> >
>
> --
> United States has 633 Billionaires with only 10 doing any annual
> significant giving.
>
>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]