[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: For text processing, which is more powerful, emacs or perl?
From: |
tomas |
Subject: |
Re: For text processing, which is more powerful, emacs or perl? |
Date: |
Sun, 20 Dec 2020 15:47:17 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 08:58:20AM -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote:
[...]
> Maybe a more modern contender would be OMeta
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OMeta
Ugh. Yet another rabbit hole. Must... control... browser... of... death :)
Thank you!
Cheers
- t
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: For text processing, which is more powerful, emacs or perl?, (continued)
- Re: For text processing, which is more powerful, emacs or perl?, Jean Louis, 2020/12/20
- Re: For text processing, which is more powerful, emacs or perl?, Hongyi Zhao, 2020/12/19
- Re: For text processing, which is more powerful, emacs or perl?, Emanuel Berg, 2020/12/19
- Re: For text processing, which is more powerful, emacs or perl?, Harald Jörg, 2020/12/19
- Re: For text processing, which is more powerful, emacs or perl?, Jean Louis, 2020/12/19
Re: For text processing, which is more powerful, emacs or perl?, Stefan Monnier, 2020/12/19
- Re: For text processing, which is more powerful, emacs or perl?, Jean Louis, 2020/12/20
- Re: For text processing, which is more powerful, emacs or perl?, Stefan Monnier, 2020/12/20
- Re: For text processing, which is more powerful, emacs or perl?,
tomas <=
Re: For text processing, which is more powerful, emacs or perl?, tomas, 2020/12/20