[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Reply-To -> CC?
From: |
Pankaj Jangid |
Subject: |
Re: Reply-To -> CC? |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Dec 2020 18:02:23 +0530 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Teemu Likonen <tlikonen@iki.fi> writes:
>>> If one is sending a message to a random (non-hacker) person one just
>>> can't rely on special hacker client features like "Mail-Followup-To"
>>> or "reply to list". Those things don't exist outside our bubble.
>>> There are only "reply to sender" and "reply to all".
>>
>> Sorry, but is not like that. Those things do exist in our bubble which
>> is named Emacs.
>
> You talk too much beside the point. Do you think that "Mail-Followup-To"
> headers will actually work in original poster's dog school community?
Calm down, friend. :-)
MFT may or may not work in OP’s case. Sames as Reply-To. It all depends
on the sender’s MUA and her exact action that she used to reply.
- Re: Reply-To -> CC?, (continued)
- Re: Reply-To -> CC?, Gregor Zattler, 2020/12/22
- Re: Reply-To -> CC?, Michael Heerdegen, 2020/12/23
- Re: Reply-To -> CC?, Emanuel Berg, 2020/12/23
- Re: Reply-To -> CC?, Jean Louis, 2020/12/23
- Re: Reply-To -> CC?, Michael Heerdegen, 2020/12/23
- Re: Reply-To -> CC?, Teemu Likonen, 2020/12/23
- Re: Reply-To -> CC?, Jean Louis, 2020/12/23
- Re: Reply-To -> CC?, Teemu Likonen, 2020/12/23
- Re: Reply-To -> CC?, Jean Louis, 2020/12/23
- Re: Reply-To -> CC?, Teemu Likonen, 2020/12/23
- Re: Reply-To -> CC?,
Pankaj Jangid <=
- Re: Reply-To -> CC?, Michael Heerdegen, 2020/12/23
- Re: Reply-To -> CC?, Jean Louis, 2020/12/23