Re: PROPOSAL: Repurpose one key and reserve it for third-party packages

[Gregory Heytings]

> > That's not the proposal, that's the way you look at the proposal.  The 
> > proposal is to free one or two keys,
>
> You clearly said _one_ key, many times.  Glad to hear now that it's two 
> keys (or at least "1 or 2").
>
> > and to reserve them for third-party libraries.  Freeing one or two keys 
> > is (would be) an effort from the viewpoint of Emacs,
>
> Not if they're currently not bound by default.

I wonder: did you actually read the proposal?

> > Your proposal, "to reserve _ALL_ keys currently not bound by default", 
> > has I fear no chance whatsoever to be adopted.
>
> It certainly has no chance if it's not even proposed.  And your 
> immediate subsequent pull-back proposal hasn't helped.

I'm sorry to read you've seen it as a pull back.  What I saw was that your 
request was being ignored, and I tried to help with something more 
constructive.