[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: How should this profiler report interpreted?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: How should this profiler report interpreted? |
Date: |
Fri, 26 Mar 2021 18:49:59 +0300 |
> Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 15:28:26 +0000
> From: scame via Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor
> <help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
>
> > > Does this mean the save-excursion call itself consumes 99% of the CPU?
> > Yes (assuming that nothing else went on in that Emacs session when you
> > profiled the function you were interested in).
>
> Nothing else which consumes significant CPU, just the tested function.
Then I suggest to run this function many times with benchmark-run,
profile that run, and show the fully expanded profile you get.
- Re: How should this profiler report interpreted?, (continued)
- Re: How should this profiler report interpreted?, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/03/26
- Re: How should this profiler report interpreted?, scame, 2021/03/26
- Re: How should this profiler report interpreted?, Emanuel Berg, 2021/03/26
- Re: How should this profiler report interpreted?, Stefan Monnier, 2021/03/26
- Re: How should this profiler report interpreted?, Emanuel Berg, 2021/03/26
- Re: How should this profiler report interpreted?, Stefan Monnier, 2021/03/26
- Re: How should this profiler report interpreted?, Emanuel Berg, 2021/03/26
- Re: How should this profiler report interpreted?, Emanuel Berg, 2021/03/27
- Re: How should this profiler report interpreted?, Emanuel Berg, 2021/03/27
Re: How should this profiler report interpreted?, scame, 2021/03/26
Re: How should this profiler report interpreted?, scame, 2021/03/26
Re: How should this profiler report interpreted?, scame, 2021/03/26