[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: How should this profiler report interpreted?
From: |
Joost Kremers |
Subject: |
Re: How should this profiler report interpreted? |
Date: |
Fri, 26 Mar 2021 21:26:13 +0100 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.5.11; emacs 27.2 |
On Fri, Mar 26 2021, scame via Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor wrote:
>> If you can reproduce this bogus profile, please `M-x report-emacs-bug`
>> (ideally with a corresponding sample file on which to run the code).
>
> I'll do that.
>
> The computer was not unresponsive, only emacs was slow and emacs profiler said
> 99% CPU.
I don't think that means it took 99% of the CPU (as you would see with e.g.,
top). I think it means that 99% of the CPU resources used to execute the
relevant Elisp fragment were spent in the `save-excursion`.
--
Joost Kremers
Life has its moments
- Re: How should this profiler report interpreted?, (continued)
- Re: How should this profiler report interpreted?, Stefan Monnier, 2021/03/26
- Re: How should this profiler report interpreted?, Emanuel Berg, 2021/03/26
- Re: How should this profiler report interpreted?, Stefan Monnier, 2021/03/26
- Re: How should this profiler report interpreted?, Emanuel Berg, 2021/03/26
- Re: How should this profiler report interpreted?, Emanuel Berg, 2021/03/27
- Re: How should this profiler report interpreted?, Emanuel Berg, 2021/03/27
Re: How should this profiler report interpreted?, scame, 2021/03/26
Re: How should this profiler report interpreted?, scame, 2021/03/26
- Re: How should this profiler report interpreted?,
Joost Kremers <=
Re: How should this profiler report interpreted?, scame, 2021/03/26