[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why use CTL-x CTL-c to quit instead of CTL-x CTL-q?
From: |
Francis Belliveau |
Subject: |
Re: Why use CTL-x CTL-c to quit instead of CTL-x CTL-q? |
Date: |
Wed, 7 Apr 2021 17:02:43 -0400 |
> On Apr 6, 2021, at 16:52, Jean Louis <bugs@gnu.support> wrote:
>
> If I remember well "vi" stands for "victim":
>
That sounds wrong to me since the original version was just a full-screen
terminal interface for "ed". More likely it would have stood for "video
interface" since "ed" was designed to support "paper terminal" interfaces.
- Re: Why use CTL-x CTL-c to quit instead of CTL-x CTL-q?, (continued)