Re: FW: FW: [External] : Re: require (was: Re: Hooks in minor modes)

[Emanuel Berg]

Drew Adams wrote:

>>>> And why is everything nil??? :)
>>>
>>> Looks to me like everything is mil, not nil?
>>                                 ^^^      ^^^
>> ?
>
> This is what your message (as received by me) shows
> (multiple such errors):
>
>   Error: Symbol's value as variable is void: mil
>
> I can only guess that your code uses "mil" but you really
> meant to write "nil". That would explain such errors: `mil'
> is undefined as a variable (by default), but `nil'
> self-evaluates to itself.

WT...?

You are right, it said (setq ir-path mil) !

Elite hackers at work...

-- 
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal