Re: On markdown images

[Emanuel Berg]

>>> But the height vary from image to image, should I put it
>>> "explicitly" as attributes in the HTML [2] then?
>>
>> I wouldn’t. Having width in CSS and height in HTML
>> feels wrong.
>
> But to have the same value (the width) appear over and over
> in HTML isn't good either and there is already a CSS class,
> and removing width from it won't remove the class since
> there are other settings there as well...
>
> Individual CSS classes for height only option to my mind,
> I think the height is the same for a bunch of pics tho, so
> that one can put in the base class along with the shared
> settings, then the imgs that have different height they get
> their own class in addition to the base class which will
> override it with respect to height only...

Got it to work with CSS only, lines 36-49:

  https://dataswamp.org/~incal/index.css

No reflow! :)

-- 
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal