[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Quote by Knuth
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: Quote by Knuth |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Jul 2021 00:54:17 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Christopher Dimech wrote:
> I understand that. About twenty years ago, I tried it.
> It gets things even more complicated than they are.
Yes, of course, as macros involve yet another layer
in-between. You don't write source to do stuff, you write
source to write source to do stuff.
> I rather have a number of small well contained
> implementations. I disagree with Knuth that a practitioner
> of literate programming becomes an essayist, whose main
> concern is with exposition and excellence of style, rather
> than how to perform the actual computation.
Aha, so that's the idea/vision! Well, how poetic! But very
impractical in all the easy cases, and even more so in the
difficult ones.
> The biggest problem has always been how to do something,
> rather than how to describe it.
Well, these are two different tendencies, and where they all
lead, only Jehovah knows. For example the thought with C++,
C with classes, solve the problem by creating a model (an OO
model) of it. An interesting thought that lead to a small
revolution of the ... computer game industry? And today, the
C++ enthusiasts are often not enthusiastic about OO. "It was
big in the 90s, but ..."
> I gave up trying to put everything in one file.
Say what, of course you can't do that :)
> And if done by students the problems will became even worse.
OK, so what group do you belong to? Please tell so we can
generalize negatively about them.
> I know a few professors myself claiming to work on the
> dynamic properties of everything and the bullshit they say
> they have developed. They say they develop the theories,
> they develop the computational algorithms needed, they do
> everything. Until you do some work with them and realise
> there's not much to their work. Welcome to the world of
> academia in the western world.
>
> Consider Ramanujan and Perelman for instance. Both have
> worked from some pit hole making great soup.
> Modern societies have started treating everything as in some
> state of illness. The second largest industry on the planet
> is pharmaceuticals, which makes too much lousy soup.
>
> You just have to look at how the development of the
> coronavirus vaccines are happening ! Everyday, you have to
> add something else to them, else they won't work. If you're
> constantly creating nasty chemistry, how can life within you
> understand that you're seeking well-being?
Hm ... maybe the group is people with justice
obsession syndrome? If so, yeah, they stink.
--
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal
- Quote by Knuth, (continued)
- Quote by Knuth, Christopher Dimech, 2021/07/18
- Re: Quote by Knuth, Jean Louis, 2021/07/18
- Quote by Knuth, Christopher Dimech, 2021/07/18
- Re: Quote by Knuth, Jean Louis, 2021/07/18
- Quote by Knuth, Christopher Dimech, 2021/07/18
- Re: Quote by Knuth, Emanuel Berg, 2021/07/18
- Quote by Knuth, Christopher Dimech, 2021/07/20
- Quote by Knuth, Christopher Dimech, 2021/07/20
- Re: Quote by Knuth, Emanuel Berg, 2021/07/18
- Quote by Knuth, Christopher Dimech, 2021/07/20
- Re: Quote by Knuth,
Emanuel Berg <=
- Quote by Knuth, Christopher Dimech, 2021/07/20
- Quote by Knuth, Christopher Dimech, 2021/07/18
- Re: Quote by Knuth, Emanuel Berg, 2021/07/18
- Re: Quote by Knuth, Emanuel Berg, 2021/07/18
- Re: Quote by Knuth, Emanuel Berg, 2021/07/14
- Re: Quote by Knuth, Emanuel Berg, 2021/07/14
- Quote by Knuth, Christopher Dimech, 2021/07/14
- Re: Quote by Knuth, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/07/15
- Re: Quote by Knuth, Emanuel Berg, 2021/07/18
- Re: Quote by Knuth, tomas, 2021/07/19