[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: input methods for mathematical glyphs
From: |
Eduardo Ochs |
Subject: |
Re: input methods for mathematical glyphs |
Date: |
Thu, 9 Dec 2021 13:06:50 -0300 |
On Thu, 9 Dec 2021 at 11:55, Leo Butler <leo.butler@umanitoba.ca> wrote:
>
> Hi Eduardo, Thanks for the pointer to your work. It looks very
> accessible and much closer to my wants than the TeX input method. I
> wonder if you have an idea of how difficult it would be to extend it to
> include all (or almost all) glyphs found here:
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_operators_and_symbols_in_Unicode
Hi Leo,
that wouldn't be practical because you would have to choose a two-character
abbreviation for each of all these unicode characters. But it would be easy
to add, say, 200 characters, and then add others when you need to...
[[]], E.
- Re: input methods for mathematical glyphs, (continued)
Re: input methods for mathematical glyphs, Eduardo Ochs, 2021/12/08