Re: input methods for mathematical glyphs

[Emanuel Berg]

Eduardo Ochs wrote:

> that wouldn't be practical because you would have to choose
> a two-character abbreviation for each of all these
> unicode characters.

In order to use them you must have a way of referring to them.
If that's not practical what you describe, then what would
you prefer?

There is no need to worry about choosing, adding, etc - step 1
is to decide what one wants, after that there is always a way
(often several ways) to figure out how it will be put into
practice ...

-- 
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal