Re: lexical-let void function

[Emanuel Berg]

GNU Hacker wrote:

> I fixed it adding
>
>  -*- lexical-binding: t; -*-
>
> to the first line

Not adding 

;;; -*- lexical-binding: t -*-

in Joe Sixpack Elisp is considered a bug today, even.

And I guess I agree since I always thought such a cookie is
a poor man's solution! Badnesses: not the Lisp syntax,
a misuse of comment notation, reminds me of the
C preprocessor, etc ...

Sorry to repeat this like a paleo-parrot on Terra Prima, but
give us explicit code i.e. dlet/llet/slet ...

(Where `let' would be an alias to `llet', or the other way
around perhaps.)

> Just do
>
> M-x elisp-enable-lexical-binding

Fragile.

-- 
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal