Re: A more specific/targeted version of macroexpand-all?

[Michael Heerdegen]

Okamsn <okamsn@protonmail.com> writes:

> I have been able to explicitly prevent expansion of macros by including
> them in the second argument of `macroexpand-all`, such as in
>
>      (macroexpand-all my-code `((cl-block) (cl-return-from) ,@my-macros))

I didn't know that nil-valued bindings work there.

> but that still leaves the possibility of other, unknown macros expanding
> incorrectly.

Why would they expand incorrectly?  Not sure I understand what you want.

Michael.