[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Making a function than can only be used interactively
From: |
Christopher Dimech |
Subject: |
Re: Making a function than can only be used interactively |
Date: |
Tue, 5 Jul 2022 01:42:50 +0200 |
Jul 4, 2022, 22:35 by help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org:
>>>>> Depends whether the person coding that function thinks it is.
>>>>> What can he do then? Issue warning as you suggested with `declare`?
>>> I don't think we can answer this in the abstract. So, we'd first need
>>> to have some concrete scenario before we can start discussing it.
>>> Stefan
Even with a concrete example, it is quite likely that we would not be able to
capture
the way it was used. Especially if one uses
(defun foo ()
(interactive)
(let ((a ...)
(b ...)
(c ...))
...))
- Re: Making a function than can only be used interactively, (continued)
- Re: Making a function than can only be used interactively, Christopher Dimech, 2022/07/04
- Re: Making a function than can only be used interactively, Stefan Monnier, 2022/07/04
- Re: Making a function than can only be used interactively, Christopher Dimech, 2022/07/04
- Re: Making a function than can only be used interactively, Stefan Monnier, 2022/07/04
- RE: [External] : Re: Making a function than can only be used interactively, Drew Adams, 2022/07/05
- Re: RE: [External] : Making a function than can only be used interactively, Christopher Dimech, 2022/07/05
- RE: RE: [External] : Making a function than can only be used interactively, Drew Adams, 2022/07/05
- Message not available
- FW: RE: RE: [External] : Making a function than can only be used interactively, Drew Adams, 2022/07/05
- Re: FW: RE: RE: [External] : Making a function than can only be used interactively, Christopher Dimech, 2022/07/05
- Re: Making a function than can only be used interactively, Christopher Dimech, 2022/07/04
Re: Making a function than can only be used interactively,
Christopher Dimech <=