Re: Prefix Argument and optional argument

[Michael Heerdegen]

Yuri Khan <yuri.v.khan@gmail.com> writes:

> > It warns about transposed interactive spec and docstring - a programmer
> > error.
>
> In the original post, the order is the same in both examples — first
> the docstring, then the interactive spec, then the body forms. I do
> not understand why one would cause a warning but not the other.

That doesn't happen for these examples AFAICT.  These were only
skeletons, however.  I didn't follow who compiled what, I only tried to
explain the intention of the warnings.

You also get such a warning for a function with an interactive spec but
an empty body.  Maybe that had happened to someone.

Michael.