Re: Morally equivalent

[Christopher Dimech]

> Sent: Friday, October 21, 2022 at 2:05 AM
> From: "Akib Azmain Turja" <akib@disroot.org>
> To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: Morally equivalent
>
> Emanuel Berg <incal@dataswamp.org> writes:
>
> > Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> >
> >>> How did a simple phrase generate so much noise on
> >>> this list?
> >>
> >> The noise level on this (and not only this) list is
> >> inversely proportional to the simplicity of the issue.
> >
> > One can only dream of a world where that was reversed, so the
> > the more complicated something was, the more brilliant and
> > to-the-point comments it would get ...
>
> There are many examples of discussions that result in nothing except the
> waste of the time of many people.  This is also "morally" (if not
> completely) equivalent to those discussions.
>
> IMHO, even this message is a waste of time.

The waste of time was arguing for "Morally Equivalent", when an OP wants
a clarification.

> --
> Akib Azmain Turja
>
> Find me on Mastodon at @akib@hostux.social, and on Codeberg (user
> "akib").
>
> This message is signed by me with my GnuPG key.  Its fingerprint is:
>
>     7001 8CE5 819F 17A3 BBA6  66AF E74F 0EFA 922A E7F5
>