Re: Calling a function with undefined symbol

[Emanuel Berg]

Heime wrote:

> I can call this function with
>
> (mbcomplt 'go)
>
> This even though the symbol "'go" does not exist.

C'mon now, it's such a common and short name, no doubt someone
in the Lisp world has defined it already!

Actually there are a lot more exotic ones that are also
symbols, e.g.

  (symbolp 'symbols-are-us) ; t

Go on, try a bunch with `symbolp' yourself, you'll be
surprised how many symbols there are out there ...

-- 
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal