Re: elisp--curent-symbol question

[Emanuel Berg]

Arthur Miller wrote:

> Also the comment seem to belong to doc-string rather than
> a comment outside the function. Same follows for some other
> internal functions there, but that is a minor

Yeah, but why do it incorrectly when it's so easy to do
it right?

Also, in elisp-mode.el in particular XD

No, but practice on these:

elisp-mode.el:283: Argument ‘interactive’ should appear (as INTERACTIVE) in the 
doc string
elisp-mode.el:348: You should convert this comment to documentation
elisp-mode.el:363: Argument ‘vars’ should appear (as VARS) in the doc string
elisp-mode.el:466: Argument ‘pos’ should appear (as POS) in the doc string
elisp-mode.el:1031: You should convert this comment to documentation
elisp-mode.el:1281: Argument ‘end’ should appear (as END) in the doc string
elisp-mode.el:1332: Argument ‘eval-last-sexp-arg-internal’ should appear (as 
EVAL-LAST-SEXP-ARG-INTERNAL) in the doc string
elisp-mode.el:1559: Argument ‘eval-last-sexp-arg-internal’ should appear (as 
EVAL-LAST-SEXP-ARG-INTERNAL) in the doc string
elisp-mode.el:1591: Argument ‘form’ should appear (as FORM) in the doc string
elisp-mode.el:1691: Argument ‘edebug-it’ should appear (as EDEBUG-IT) in the 
doc string
elisp-mode.el:1737: Second line should not have indentation
elisp-mode.el:1769: Argument ‘callback’ should appear (as CALLBACK) in the doc 
string
elisp-mode.el:1781: Argument ‘callback’ should appear (as CALLBACK) in the doc 
string
elisp-mode.el:1792: Argument ‘callback’ should appear (as CALLBACK) in the doc 
string
elisp-mode.el:1819: Argument ‘index’ should appear (as INDEX) in the doc string
elisp-mode.el:1850: Arguments occur in the doc string out of order

-- 
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal