[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PGTK+ warning
From: |
Alessandro Bertulli |
Subject: |
Re: PGTK+ warning |
Date: |
Sat, 19 Nov 2022 11:21:35 +0100 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.8.11; emacs 29.0.50 |
Emanuel Berg <incal@dataswamp.org> writes:
> I realized you can simply use `remove-hook' to remove your
> addition to it :)
Yap, this together with the one-umbrella-function approach should do the
trick, thanks! I wonder:
- Is this the same approach used by use-package?
- Are there any shortcomings in having a single function in the hook?
maybe for debugging purposes. I'd say no, since actually you can
instrument a single function to debug, it becomes even simpler, and
there aren't really other reasons, are they?
--
Alessandro Bertulli
- Re: PGTK+ warning, (continued)
- Re: PGTK+ warning, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/11/15
- Re: PGTK+ warning, Alessandro Bertulli, 2022/11/16
- Re: PGTK+ warning, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/11/17
- Re: PGTK+ warning, Emanuel Berg, 2022/11/18
- Re: PGTK+ warning, Alessandro Bertulli, 2022/11/19
- Re: PGTK+ warning, Emanuel Berg, 2022/11/15
- Re: PGTK+ warning, Alessandro Bertulli, 2022/11/15
- Re: PGTK+ warning, Emanuel Berg, 2022/11/16
- Re: PGTK+ warning, Alessandro Bertulli, 2022/11/16
- Re: PGTK+ warning, Emanuel Berg, 2022/11/18
- Re: PGTK+ warning,
Alessandro Bertulli <=
Re: PGTK+ warning, Emanuel Berg, 2022/11/15