[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (*) -> 1
From: |
Michael Heerdegen |
Subject: |
Re: (*) -> 1 |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Jan 2023 15:29:40 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> This whole thread should have moved to emacs-tangents long ago.
The thread is partly about the interpretation and understanding of a
mathematical operation. But it is also a question about Elisp and it's
usage, and understanding existing Elisp code, it matters in practice, so
emacs-help does not seem wrong to me. It's also not wrong IMO to have
these answers in the archives, others may have the same question, and
understanding the background helps to remember the conventions. That's
why I continued debating here.
Michael.
- Re: (*) -> 1, (continued)
- RE: [External] : Re: (*) -> 1, Drew Adams, 2023/01/19
- Re: [External] : Re: (*) -> 1, Michael Heerdegen, 2023/01/19
- Re: [External] : Re: (*) -> 1, Jean Louis, 2023/01/20
- Re: [External] : Re: (*) -> 1, Emanuel Berg, 2023/01/21
- Re: (*) -> 1, Anders Munch, 2023/01/18
- Re: (*) -> 1, Michael Heerdegen, 2023/01/18
- Re: (*) -> 1, Emanuel Berg, 2023/01/19
- Re: (*) -> 1, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/01/18
- Re: (*) -> 1,
Michael Heerdegen <=
- Message not available
- (*) -> 1, Jean Louis, 2023/01/17
- Re: [External] : Re: How to make M-x TAB not work on (interactive) declaration?, Emanuel Berg, 2023/01/17