[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs empty startup time increased from v 27.1 to 29.0 by factor 3?
From: |
Gregor Zattler |
Subject: |
Re: emacs empty startup time increased from v 27.1 to 29.0 by factor 3? |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Jan 2023 01:00:49 +0100 |
Hi Eli, emacs users,
* Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> [2023-01-23; 17:08 +02]:
>> From: Gregor Zattler <telegraph@gmx.net>
>> Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 15:08:15 +0100
>>
>> time /usr/bin/emacs-gtk -Q -nw -f save-buffers-kill-emacs
>>
>> which starts emacs 27.1 as precompiled in debian / Bullseye
>> and kills it again, a low time values on my laptop are e.g.:
>>
>> real 0m0,328s
>> user 0m0,262s
>> sys 0m0,058s
>>
>>
>> while for emacs v29.0 the same command line achives low
>> values like this one:
>>
>> real 0m1,007s
>> user 0m0,847s
>> sys 0m0,154s
>>
>> The 29.0 version is compiled with native-compilation
>> support. Does this explain the differences?
>
> It could. Emacs with native-compilation needs to load all the
> preloaded Lisp packages as shared libraries, as opposed to just
> mapping the pdumper file into the address space in Emacs 27. To be
> sure, build Emacs 29 without native-compilation, and then compare.
So I did. The lowest values for the same command with a
slightly newer Version which was built with --with-native-compilation=no
are:
$ time src/emacs -Q -nw -f save-buffers-kill-emacs
real 0m0,596s
user 0m0,483s
sys 0m0,105s
while the very same tree build with --with-native-compilation
$ time src/emacs -Q -nw -f save-buffers-kill-emacs
real 0m1,082s
user 0m0,902s
sys 0m0,169s
This shows: a) native compilation slows Emacs' startup (and
shutdown?). b) Without native compilation support Emacs
27.1 is faster in this nano-benchmark than Emacs 29.0.
Ciao; Gregor
--
-... --- .-. . -.. ..--.. ...-.-