[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [External] : forward-sexp
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: [External] : forward-sexp |
Date: |
Sat, 12 Aug 2023 20:41:58 +0000 |
> > But similarly, if you try just ["abc] or ["(abc] then you'll
> > run into the same group-didn't-end
> > (no-matching-delimiter) behavior.
>
> There should be no incorrect commands, if there are there will
> be people using them "incorrectly", if you will. But if every
> command work everywhere none of that can happen, right?
What do you think is incorrect in the examples given?
When you ask Emacs to go forward in such a way as to
take into account balanced delimiters such as parens,
then if it doesn't find a closing delimiter that
matches before the end of the buffer, it tells you
that. Seems like the right behavior, to me...
- RE: [External] : forward-sexp, (continued)
- RE: [External] : forward-sexp, Drew Adams, 2023/08/11
- Re: [External] : forward-sexp, Andreas Röhler, 2023/08/12
- Re: [External] : forward-sexp, Emanuel Berg, 2023/08/12
- RE: [External] : forward-sexp, Drew Adams, 2023/08/12
- Re: [External] : forward-sexp, Emanuel Berg, 2023/08/13
- RE: [External] : forward-sexp, Drew Adams, 2023/08/13
- Re: [External] : forward-sexp, Emanuel Berg, 2023/08/12
- RE: [External] : forward-sexp,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: [External] : forward-sexp, Emanuel Berg, 2023/08/13
- Re: [External] : forward-sexp, Pierre Rouleau, 2023/08/13
- RE: [External] : forward-sexp, Drew Adams, 2023/08/13
- Re: [External] : forward-sexp, Pierre Rouleau, 2023/08/13
- Re: [External] : forward-sexp, Emanuel Berg, 2023/08/22
- Re: [External] : forward-sexp, Emanuel Berg, 2023/08/22
- Re: [External] : forward-sexp, Emanuel Berg, 2023/08/22
- RE: [External] : forward-sexp, Drew Adams, 2023/08/13
- Re: [External] : forward-sexp, Emanuel Berg, 2023/08/12
- RE: [External] : forward-sexp, Drew Adams, 2023/08/11