[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Question about let binding behavior
From: |
Tomas Hlavaty |
Subject: |
Re: Question about let binding behavior |
Date: |
Wed, 09 Oct 2024 10:13:06 +0200 |
On Wed 09 Oct 2024 at 08:01, Louis-Guillaume Gagnon via Users list for the GNU
Emacs text editor <help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org> wrote:
> The interpreter is free to use the same underlying list whenever I
> refer to this constant
compiler too
> My program relied on modifying the constant
don't do that
> By using "copy-tree" on the constant
or you can avoid the constant in the first place, for example with
minimal change like this:
(let ((baz `((quux . 0) (quuz . 0))))
- Question about let binding behavior, Louis-Guillaume Gagnon, 2024/10/08
- Re: Question about let binding behavior, tomas, 2024/10/08
- Re: Question about let binding behavior, Louis-Guillaume Gagnon, 2024/10/08
- Re: Question about let binding behavior, tomas, 2024/10/08
- Re: Question about let binding behavior, tomas, 2024/10/08
- Re: Question about let binding behavior, Louis-Guillaume Gagnon, 2024/10/09
- Re: Question about let binding behavior,
Tomas Hlavaty <=
- Re: Question about let binding behavior, Stefan Monnier, 2024/10/09
- Re: Question about let binding behavior, Tomas Hlavaty, 2024/10/10
- Re: Question about let binding behavior, Stefan Monnier, 2024/10/10
- Re: Question about let binding behavior, Rudolf Schlatte, 2024/10/18
- Re: Question about let binding behavior, Joost Kremers, 2024/10/08
- Re: Question about let binding behavior, Michael Heerdegen, 2024/10/08
- Re: Question about let binding behavior, Michael Heerdegen, 2024/10/08
RE: [External] : Question about let binding behavior, Drew Adams, 2024/10/08
Re: Question about let binding behavior, Stefan Monnier, 2024/10/08