[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Is ChatGPT bullshit?
From: |
tomas |
Subject: |
Is ChatGPT bullshit? |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Dec 2024 22:58:13 +0100 |
On Tue, Dec 24, 2024 at 11:57:08AM +0100, Andreas Röhler wrote:
>
> Am 17.12.24 um 22:35 schrieb Jean Louis:
> > ChatGPT is bullshit |
Most definitely, yes. The already linked Uni Glasgow article [1] makes
a compelling case.
> No, it isn't. We have a language problem, because we have something new.
> Must split the notion of intelligence.
>
> People tried to fly like a bird. Where they successful?
>
> Not really.
>
> But no bird is able to reach the moon.
>
> LLMs are able to reason. With the amount of data they will be -- and
> probably already are-- much stronger in reasoning/deduction then humans.
No. They can babble /as if/ they were reasoning.
Jeez. I thought we had cleared that ca 1966 [2]:
Cheers
[1]
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10676-024-09775-5?error=cookies_not_supported&code=a86869b1-3f10-4599-aeb1-f482d3a4d2e2#Aff1
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ELIZA_effect
--
t
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: Enhancing ELisp for AI Work, (continued)
- Re: Enhancing ELisp for AI Work, Jean Louis, 2024/12/17
- Re: Enhancing ELisp for AI Work, Jean Louis, 2024/12/17
- Re: Enhancing ELisp for AI Work, Tomáš Petit, 2024/12/17
- Re: Enhancing ELisp for AI Work, Jean Louis, 2024/12/17
- Re: Enhancing ELisp for AI Work, tomas, 2024/12/18
- Re: Enhancing ELisp for AI Work, Andreas Röhler, 2024/12/24
- Re: Enhancing ELisp for AI Work, Stefan Monnier, 2024/12/24
- Re: Enhancing ELisp for AI Work, Andreas Röhler, 2024/12/25
- Re: Enhancing ELisp for AI Work, Christopher Howard, 2024/12/24
- Re: Enhancing ELisp for AI Work, Joel Reicher, 2024/12/26
- Is ChatGPT bullshit?,
tomas <=
- Re: Enhancing ELisp for AI Work, Jean Louis, 2024/12/24
Re: Enhancing ELisp for AI Work, Jean Louis, 2024/12/16