[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
CXX in configure.in, vs CXX as arg to configure: different results
From: |
ted |
Subject: |
CXX in configure.in, vs CXX as arg to configure: different results |
Date: |
31 Mar 2006 11:32:15 -0800 |
User-agent: |
G2/0.2 |
I get different results if, on the one hand, I set CXX inside
configure.in, or if, on the other hand, I pass a CXX argument when I
run configure. The C++ compiler is, in both cases, the one I indicate.
But what's different is the list of libraries that get placed on the
link line. (I'm using autoconf as well as automake and libtool.)
I could of course provide more details, but for now my question is one
of principle; should I even expect these two different ways of
specifying CXX to be equivalent?
(In case I've already been too vague: inside configure.in I have
something like this:
case "${host}" in
*aix*) CXX=mpCC_r
...
esac
The other way is to run configure like this:
./configure CXX=mpCC_r
)
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- CXX in configure.in, vs CXX as arg to configure: different results,
ted <=