[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: grep -r doesn't work for me

From: Mickey Ferguson
Subject: Re: grep -r doesn't work for me
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 18:25:39 GMT

Bob, thanks for the help.  You are right about the missing directory 
argument.  I missed that earlier.  By supplying ".", it eliminated the 'Not 
enough space' error.  I finally got it to the point where I got it mostly 
working, but I discovered one thing about the port that may be good for the 
unix environment, but doesn't work for Windows:  The filename pattern 
matching is case sensitive.  In other words, if I had a file named 
"MyFile.txt" and I searched for "my*.txt" (without the quotes in both 
cases), it would fail to find it, while if I searched for "My*.txt" it would 
find it.  I understand that in the unix world filenames are case-sensitive, 
but in the Windows world they are not.  Thus, file pattern matching should 
not be case-sensitive for the Windows implementation.

"Bob Proulx" <> wrote in message
> Mickey Ferguson wrote:
>> My problem is that it just doesn't work for me.  (I'm using XP SP2.)
>> When I use the -r switch, I get a 'Not enough space' error.
> That does seem strange.
>> ->grep -rl --include=*.ini Change
>> grep: (standard input): Not enough space
> First things first.  You are missing a directory argument in which to
> recurse.  Because grep does not have any file/directory arguments to
> process it defaults to reading standard input.  Using -r does not make
> sense with regards to standard input.
> Fix this first by giving grep a directory to recurse into.  When using
> the -r option it is typical to use the '.' directory.  Try this:
>  grep -rl --include=*.ini Change .
>> I've created an alias in my command processor (4nt) language, that
> The typical way to do this would be to use 'find'.
>  find . -name "*.ini" -exec grep -l Change {} +
> The {} is replaced by find with a maximum list of filenames and the
> '+' terminates the command.
>> ... This works fine, but I'd rather figure out what I'm doing wrong
>> above with the -r switch.
> Admirable.  Looks like it is a bug in the port to me.  It doesn't give
> that error in GNU grep's native GNU environment.  But your results
> sound as if the code is trying to recurse on stdin and failing.  That
> should be reported to the Cygwin folks.
> Bob

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]