[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Help-gnunet] Major ouches
From: |
Tom Barnes-Lawrence |
Subject: |
Re: [Help-gnunet] Major ouches |
Date: |
Wed, 7 May 2003 23:38:49 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 10:56:45PM +0100, I wrote:
>
> #0 0xbf3ff808 in ?? ()
> #1 0x40377829 in lowCountContentEntries (handle=0x805dd00) at low_bdb.c:320
> #2 0x403779c8 in lowWriteContent (handle=0x805dd00, name=0xbf3ff8b0,
> len=1056, block=0x81084f0) at low_bdb.c:409
Now I actually look at that, that does bring up the question I'd had
in my mind earlier: Is it supposed to be using plain old berkeley
DB1 (the one that is included with glibc), because the database_bdb
module is linked against libdb3.so
I don't know if that's backwards compatible or not.
If this *is* the cause, it should be noted that even though I installed
the db3 development package, you can still specifically link against
libdb1.so (on Debian at least) whilst libdb.so is determined by whichever
dev package is installed.
Tomble