[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Help-gnunet] question about namespaces and sporadic updates
From: |
Christian Grothoff |
Subject: |
Re: [Help-gnunet] question about namespaces and sporadic updates |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Mar 2004 23:47:55 -0500 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.4.3 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 17 March 2004 06:07 am, David Roundy wrote:
> Is there any way to recursively add a directory
> structure to my namespace?
Yes, use the options "-rb" (-r for recursive processing, -b for "build
directories"). That should give you almost exactly what you want. Oh, and
I'd suggest using gnunet-gtk for downloading directories, it gives you a nice
way to "browse" the directory structure (do a namespace search for the root,
then you can start to navigate directories).
> It would also be nice to have a flag to tell gnunet-search to exit after it
> has found one reasonable match (where "reasonable" may be a bit tricky to
> define). A timeout of 1 second (and the timeout doesn't seem to accept
> floating input) would add about four hours to downloading the (rather
> large) repository I was considering making available via gnunet.
Eh, what? I'm not sure I understand what you're talking about here. How can
1s take 4 hours??? I don't see why anyone would want floating-point
timeouts, but it should be trivial for anyone to add an option "exit after n
search results".
> Perhaps I should just give up on the idea of using gnunet, since it doesn't
> seem to be designed to scale for the purposes for which I'd be interested
> in using it, which is as an alternative transport mechanism (that is,
> alternative to http, scp, ftp etc) for darcs repositories.
I don't know what darcs is. Also, http/scp/ftp etc. are not really anonymous,
so there will always be some performance hit right here. If you don't need
anonymity (or deniability), don't use GNUnet's AFS. In the future we might
have non-anonymous (and thus faster) transport mechanisms build on top of
GNUnet. Either way, GNUnet makes no sense at all as a replacement for ftp or
scp, if you need scp, use scp (or with updates, rsync / rdist!). We're not
trying to build a replacement for these fine tools here.
Christian
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAWSn79tNtMeXQLkIRAqY9AKChdARe07w6kWn0BmbegNlV4F822gCgqMxs
GoFl4meIZQbCql5coIuRnzk=
=i18e
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----