----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2022 11:30:04 +0200
From: ToBo <tobo@rechnerpool.de>
To: Help-gnunet <Help-gnunet@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: route learning
Message-ID: <A22A8EFF-9EF1-4DA0-B670-22EE5200377D@rechnerpool.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Hi,
29 juli 2022 kl. 22:58 skrev Martin Schanzenbach <mschanzenbach@posteo.de>:
Excerpts from ToBo's message of 2022-07-29 14:23:48 +0200:
I set up a three nodes in a very simple configuration: A and B is behind NAT,
so they both have to communicate with each other through C
A -> C <- B
All nodes are in friend only mode. All nodes have some knowledge of each other, at least you can
see infos in "gnunet-peerinfo" or "gnunet-peerinfo -f" (what is the exact
difference anyway?)
Do you have any actual connections?
Try with "gnunet-core".
I mainly used gnunet-transport to monitor that, but yes, gnunet-core
has shown the same.
Why does a gnunet-cadet don't find it's way from A to B ?
This may be due to many reasons. Try compiling gnunet with
"--enable-logging=verbose" and set the debug level for cadet to DEBUG.
Then check logs.
That would be my first approach (IF you have connections at all see
above).
I recompiled it and tried again, this time it worked for whatever
reason. Sometimes the behavior of GNUnet is hard to understand.
How can I configure a minimal set of deamons to just have a network or session
layer with cadet? I think this will help in understanding the whole thing.