help-gnunet
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Cannot bootstrap GNUnet 0.21.0


From: marty1885
Subject: Re: Cannot bootstrap GNUnet 0.21.0
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 16:46:18 +0000

Hi,

Thanks for the direction. I looked into my GNUnet logs and see DHT is spamming 
"No DHT underlays configured" message.

I have attached a debug log. GNUnet generated more then 10MB in less then 1 
minutes.

2024-03-14T00:38:24.453491+0800 dht-3589431 ERROR No DHT underlays configured!
2024-03-14T00:38:24.477297+0800 dht-3589432 ERROR No DHT underlays configured!
2024-03-14T00:38:24.501079+0800 dht-3589433 ERROR No DHT underlays configured!
2024-03-14T00:38:24.518726+0800 dht-3589434 ERROR No DHT underlays configured!
2024-03-14T00:38:24.535907+0800 dht-3589435 ERROR No DHT underlays configured!
2024-03-14T00:38:24.555994+0800 dht-3589436 ERROR No DHT underlays configured!
2024-03-14T00:38:24.576093+0800 dht-3589437 ERROR No DHT underlays configured!
...
On Wednesday, March 13th, 2024 at 6:45 PM, t3sserakt <t3ss@posteo.de> wrote:

> Hey Martin,
> 
> the actual log of the bootstrap peer begins 9 in the morning on the 12th. I 
> can not see any log entry for your peer CCXH in the bootstrap peer logs.
> 
> Do you have any output if you grep for "Abort" in yours peer log file?
> 
> You could start your peer with log level DEBUG to see more details what your 
> peer is doing, and could provide us the log entries of your log running for a 
> minute after starting the peer with log level DEBUG.
> 
> - t3sserakt
> 
> On 13.03.24 11:10, marty1885 wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Yes. I've restarted GNUnet several times. For safety I've restarted it once 
> > again after reeving your reply. Still can't bootstrap.
> > 
> > Martin
> > 
> > On Tuesday, March 12th, 2024 at 10:15 PM, Schanzenbach, Martin 
> > <schanzen@gnunet.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > did you try again the last few days?
> > > We are currently observing better connectivity after fixing a
> > > configuration mistake on the bootstrap peer.
> > > 
> > > Best
> > > Martin
> > > 
> > > On 10.03.24 15:41, marty1885 wrote:
> > > 
> > > > I deleted the databases for namestore and peerstore to get all 
> > > > processes running (peerstore and namestore was failing). But still no 
> > > > peer connections.
> > > > 
> > > > `❯ gnunet-arm -I Services (excluding stopped services): (started: 23 / 
> > > > stopped: 22) cadet (binary='gnunet-service-cadet', status=started) core 
> > > > (binary='gnunet-service-core', status=started) datastore 
> > > > (binary='gnunet-service-datastore', status=started) dht 
> > > > (binary='gnunet-service-dht', status=started) fs 
> > > > (binary='gnunet-service-fs', status=started) gns 
> > > > (binary='gnunet-service-gns', status=started) hostlist 
> > > > (binary='gnunet-daemon-hostlist', status=started) identity 
> > > > (binary='gnunet-service-identity', status=started) namecache 
> > > > (binary='gnunet-service-namecache', status=started) namestore 
> > > > (binary='gnunet-service-namestore', status=started) nat 
> > > > (binary='gnunet-service-nat', status=started) nse 
> > > > (binary='gnunet-service-nse', status=started) peerstore 
> > > > (binary='gnunet-service-peerstore', status=started) reclaim 
> > > > (binary='gnunet-service-reclaim', status=started) rest 
> > > > (binary='gnunet-rest-server', status=started) revocation 
> > > > (binary='gnunet-service-revocation', status=started) rps 
> > > > (binary='gnunet-service-rps', status=started) setu 
> > > > (binary='gnunet-service-setu', status=started) statistics 
> > > > (binary='gnunet-service-statistics', status=started) topology 
> > > > (binary='gnunet-daemon-topology', status=started) transport 
> > > > (binary='gnunet-service-transport', status=started) communicator-tcp 
> > > > (binary='gnunet-communicator-tcp', status=started) zonemaster 
> > > > (binary='gnunet-service-zonemaster', status=started)`
> > > > 
> > > > On Sunday, March 10th, 2024 at 3:00 PM, Schanzenbach, Martin 
> > > > schanzen@gnunet.org wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > > 
> > > > > what does gnunet-arm -I output? Are all of the services running?
> > > > > For example, the peerstore database layout changed, so you probably 
> > > > > have
> > > > > to delete your old database 
> > > > > ($HOME/.local/share/gnunet/peerstore/sqlite.db).
> > > > > 
> > > > > The road to a stable TNG will also be bumpy, so we rely on reports 
> > > > > such
> > > > > as this to iron out the remaining bugs with it.
> > > > > 
> > > > > BR
> > > > > Martin
> > > > > 
> > > > > On 10.03.24 06:08, marty1885 wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > > Thanks for the reply.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I tried a few commands and still feels like my node is really not 
> > > > > > connected. DHT can't put, NSE returns a very small network size and 
> > > > > > GNS cannot resolve.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Is this expected?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > ```
> > > > > > ❯ gnunet-core -si
> > > > > > Current local peer identity: 
> > > > > > CCXHBE49GRQVFAVFQ3BXVXPHHD63NG6ZNY31R0F59KVDZQA42PTG
> > > > > > (no further output)
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > ❯ gnunet-dht-put -k "hello" -d "world" -e 40m
> > > > > > (hangs, this used to return almost immidately)
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > ❯ gnunet-nse
> > > > > > 1710047156276913 1.688203 0.755488 1.474102
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > ❯ gnunet-gns -u gnunet.gns.alt -t PKEY
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > Looking for `PKEY' records under` gnunet.gns.alt'
> > > > > > > > > (no output)
> > > > > > > > > ```
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > On Saturday, March 9th, 2024 at 11:39 PM, Schanzenbach, Martin 
> > > > > > schanzen@gnunet.org wrote:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > the behaviour of gnunet-core changed. You can check the new 
> > > > > > > switches
> > > > > > > with --help.
> > > > > > > Long-term core connections are know to be problematic behind 
> > > > > > > NATs, still.
> > > > > > > But with a freshly started peer, "gnunet-core -i" should give you 
> > > > > > > your
> > > > > > > peer id, "gnunet-core -s" the connections (you can also combine 
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > switches).
> > > > > > > The command should probably output the help when called without 
> > > > > > > arguments.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > BR
> > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > On 09.03.24 14:55, marty1885 wrote:
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > I've just built and installed the new GNUnet 0.21. But my node 
> > > > > > > > isn't connected to any peer after hours of waiting. Running 
> > > > > > > > gnunet-core shows no node is connected to me.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > `❯ gnunet-core (no output)`
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > I have also checked `iotop` and can confirm 
> > > > > > > > gnunet-service-transport isn't doing much IO. While I was 
> > > > > > > > expecting at least hundreds of Kbps from experience in the past.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > How can I connect to the network? Please let me know what 
> > > > > > > > information I can provide to diagnose the issue.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > > > Martin

Attachment: gnunet-2024-03-13.log
Description: Text Data


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]